US judge: ATF stings should be 'regulated... to the past'March 12, 2018 7:16pm

CHICAGO (AP) — A judge in Chicago on Monday urged federal law enforcement to stop conducting stings in which undercover agents talk suspects into agreeing to steal non-existent drugs from fictitious stash houses, saying they too often target minorities and should become a relic of the past.

Reading parts of his 73-page ruling during a hearing, Chief U.S. District Judge Ruben Castillo repeatedly questioned the fairness of the phony stash-house stings, which typically involve U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives agents posing as cartel couriers who promise lucrative payouts to would-be stash-house thieves.

"It's time for these false stash-house cases to end and be relegated to the dark corridors of the past," he said. "Our criminal justice system should not tolerate false stash-house cases anymore." He cited "inherent problems" in how the operations are run and that the stings "must been seen through the lens of our country's sad history of racism."

But Castillo stopped short of ruling that the stings meet the technical legal definition of being racially biased, and he refused a defense motion to dismiss charges against the mainly blacks suspects in several cases he is overseeing. Defense lawyers had argued the cases were tainted by racial bias from the start.

Castillo, the Chicago federal court's first Hispanic chief judge, started the first-of-its-kind hearing by acknowledging the historical importance of what he was about to say and its potential impact beyond Illinois. In a rare move, he ordered a court official to lock the courtroom doors so that reporters wouldn't disrupt the hearing by rushing out.

Castillo's ruling and extended comments were preceded by at least five years of filings on the race question, evidentiary hearings and dueling expert reports about the stings. Other U.S. district courts have grappled with the same issues, but none as thoroughly and forthrightly as the Chicago court.

Castillo and eight other federal judges held joint hearings in December to examine statistics-based evidence on the issue. Combined, the judges are overseeing a dozen different criminal cases involving more than 40 suspects arrested in stash-house stings, but they all heard the same evidence on the question about racial bias. Castillo was the first to rule, though the other judges could issue their own decisions later.

Defense attorneys contend the stings discriminate because they overwhelmingly target blacks and Latinos. They also criticize how law enforcement can arbitrarily increase the severity of charges simply by raising the amount of drugs they say are in the stash houses. Also, suspects often are charged with trying to distribute the drugs, even though the drugs never existed.

The answer to whether the stings discriminate based on race largely hinges on competing interpretations of statistics.

Jeffrey Fagan, a defense expert, testified in December that out of 94 stash-house defendants in the Chicago area between 2006 and 2013, 74 were black, 12 were Hispanic and eight were white. If the ATF criteria for picking targets were truly colorblind, he said, far more whites would have been snared.

But government witness Max Schanzenbach said Fagan's methodology was flawed. He said it's only natural that trafficking-related stings are focused where trafficking activity is highest — in low-income areas of Chicago that have a higher concentration of blacks and Hispanics.

Since the hearings, defense lawyers have said they were seeking plea deals to avoid trials. But Castillo indicated he would issue a ruling Monday even if all the defendants strike plea agreements.

Courts have ruled previously that proving racial bias doesn't necessarily require proof of explicit racist behavior, such as an official caught using racial slurs. It can sometimes be enough to point to statistical evidence that a racial group is disproportionately hurt by a policy.


Follow Michael Tarm on Twitter at

Page 1 of 1

More Stories Like This

FILE - In this 2008 file photo tennis referee Lois Goodman is shown while officiating a CIF tennis tournament, in California. A Los Angeles tennis umpire arrested before a U.S. Open match and charged in her elderly husband's 2012 death is trying to clear her name. Lois Goodman's attorneys are expected to tell jurors Wednesday, March 21, 2018, in federal court that the Los Angeles coroner's office deprived her civil rights by falsifying an autopsy report. (David Crane /Los Angeles Daily News via AP, File)
Tennis umpire seeks payback for arrest in husband's death
In this combination photo, Robin Thicke performs at the Teen Choice Awards in Los Angeles on Aug. 16, 2015, left, and Pharrell Williams attends the 2016 ABFF Awards: A Celebration of Hollywood in Beverly Hills, Calif., on  Feb. 21, 2016. A federal appeals court has ruled refused to overturn a copyright infringement verdict against Thicke and Williams over the 2013 hit song “Blurred Lines.” In a split decision from a three-judge panel, the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal on Wednesday upheld a verdict awarding $5.3 million to the family of Marvin Gaye, who said “Blurred Lines” illegally copied from the late soul singer’s “Got to Give it Up.” (Photo by Matt Sayles/Invision/AP, File)
Court sides with Marvin Gaye family in 'Blurred Lines' fight
Man snared in federal sting could be released after pleaA man who was lured into a sting by an informant cooperating with federal agents could soon be released after pleading guilty to a robbery conspiracy charge
This undated photo provided by Jeremy Weis Photography, shows Russell Bucklew, who is scheduled to die by injection Tuesday, March 20, 2018, for killing a former girlfriend's new boyfriend in 1996 in eastern Missouri. Bucklew faces a potentially "gruesome and painful" execution because of a rare medical condition that compromises the man's veins and causes multiple tumors in his head and throat, his attorney said Sunday. (Jeremy Weis Photography via AP)
The Latest: Supreme Court grants stay of execution
Court: Mexican family can't sue agent in cross-border deathFederal appeals court says U.S. Border Patrol agent who fired his gun in Texas and fatally wounded a teenager across the Mexican border cannot be sued by the teen's family
This March 2017 photo provided by the Alabama Department of Corrections shows Alabama death row inmate Walter Leroy Moody Jr., who is scheduled to be executed on April 19, 2018. Moody was condemned for the mail bomb death of U.S. Circuit Judge Robert S. Vance in December 1989, and he was blamed for a wave of bombings that terrorized the Southeast nearly 30 years ago. Officials are preparing for his execution amid a new wave of bombings in Texas. (Alabama Department of Corrections via AP)
Austin bombings revive trauma of Alabama explosion death

Related Searches

Related Searches